Religion is a widespread happening all over the world. Many parents treat religion with genuine respect and they educate their kids according to their religion and want this process to continue at educational institutions. However, this will may cause negative situations in children’s life as schools accept many diverse people and people are able to discriminate each other. Leading democratic countries build their education systems due to the statement that education has to carry a secular character.
Access to the various types and levels of education provided to citizens is regardless of their attitude to religion. Two concepts given should be absolutely separate to prevent collision of interests and creating conflict situations. Pupils should learn tolerance at schools instead of creed ostent. If parents want their kids to study the religious doctrine and acquire religious education, there are places specialized in this.
Yet, secularity is not as widely distributed as religion and a lot of countries allow teaching doctrines, beliefs, rites and rituals of prevailing religion and fund religious education. But what about religious minorities? People resist such kinds of education in public schools on a sundry basis. They are:
- Religious education bounded with government expenditures may become a reason of conflicts up-rise;
- One is based on assertion that it presents a governmental support or promotion of any religious creed laid out;
- Some opponents prove that if a single religion is catechized at the educational institution, children who do not relate to this religion will likewise feel oppression and will not be not accepted in their yearling groups.
Assertors prove that such beliefs have perfected people’s behavior and morality through the history. Their main point also states that religious practice at schools will strongly help kids in becoming kind, responsible, spiritually developed and well-socialized persons. Howsoever, religion cannot be a determinant of morality in the democratic state.
How Should It Look Like?
If a country is truly democratic and accept secularity as well, the manifestation of beliefs at public schools is inappropriate to the state’s policy. The main point is, as has been said, separation of government-run schools and religious education. It is obvious that people need to know something about religions in order to achieve the ability to have a communication with many diverse persons. But this does not mean learning distinct religious dogma.
The best way to prevent the argues about the problem is to set classes which give knowledge about the essence of religion, its history and forms, some features of main world religions and so on. It would be useful as there is nothing bad in religion: one teaches how to be a good man and do not interfere with the lives of others, another can give good advice on healthy lifestyle. Religious teachings can contribute to the creation of a positive attitude of the child. Propaganda of the absence of violence, a benevolent attitude towards others and their mistakes can also prove very useful for later life. In general, there are many examples of the benefits derived from the study of religion.
At the same time, forcing pupils to learn separate religious beliefs and doctrines may badly influence their future, worsen communicative abilities, may become an interference in improving the skill of understanding people’s actions and words. There is also a danger of proliferation of obscurantism, which is definitely a bad happening. The consensus in this question will lead to more comfortable children postposition at schools, reduction of conflicts and rise of people’s welfare.